Citation Verification for Academic Journals
Summary
Freelancer Client is hiring: Citation Verification for Academic Journals.
Location: Remote
I need a reliable freelancer to verify citations from psychological journals. The task involves checking the accuracy of:
Requirements:
• Familiarity with psychological journals and databases
• Prior experience in citation verification or psychological research
Skills: Research, Research Writing, Academic Research
Budget: $35–$40 USD
Source: Freelancer Client via Remote / Online. Apply on the source website.
Original
I need a reliable freelancer to verify citations from psychological journals. The task involves checking the accuracy of:
- Author names
- Publication dates
- Correct journal titles
The number of citations to verify is between 4
Ideal Skills and Experience:
- Familiarity with psychological journals and databases
- Attention to detail
- Prior experience in citation verification or psychological research
Confirm any and all dates, studies, journals, opinions, referenced materials, chapters and pages are accurate against the primary source and return a corrected version.
note There is no need to expand unnecessarily.
• Dutton and Aron bridge study — journal, year, exact finding
• Skinner’s reinforcement schedule research — publication details
• Bowlby’s Attachment and Loss — volumes and dates
• Ainsworth’s Strange Situation — publication details
• Sadalla, Kenrick, and Vershure dominance study — journal and
year
Mechanism 1: Arousal Misattribution
The Dutton and Aron bridge study is one of the most cited experiments in social psychology. The details below are accurate to the best of my knowledge but require verification against the primary source.
1. The Bridge Study — Dutton & Aron (1974) Dutton, D.G. & Aron, A.P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517. — This study used two bridges in British Columbia — one a low sturdy bridge, one the Capilano suspension bridge 230 feet above a gorge. An attractive female researcher approached men after crossing and asked them to complete a survey. Men on the high-anxiety bridge were significantly more likely to call her afterward. The mechanism is called arousal misattribution or excitation transfer — physiological arousal from one source (anxiety) is misattributed to another source (attraction).
⚠ VERIFY: Confirm exact page numbers and journal volume. Confirm the name Capilano suspension bridge. Confirm that the researcher was female in all conditions. Confirm the exact finding about follow-up calls.
Mechanism 2: Intermittent Reinforcement
B.F. Skinner’s research on reinforcement schedules is foundational behavioral psychology. The core finding is well established and widely cited. The specific details below should be confirmed.
2. Skinner’s Schedules of Reinforcement Skinner, B.F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Extended through: Ferster, C.B. & Skinner, B.F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. — The variable ratio reinforcement schedule — reward delivered after an unpredictable number of responses — produces the highest rate of responding and the greatest resistance to extinction. This is the schedule used by slot machines. The principle applies to human attachment patterns when one partner’s warmth and affection are unpredictable.
⚠ VERIFY: The application to human romantic relationships is an inference from the animal behavior research. I want to make certain that the mechanism is well established in behavioral psychology and the application to relationships is widely accepted in clinical practice. Although; the specific studies would be in relationship psychology literature rather than in Skinner directly.
Mechanism 3: Attachment Theory
3. Bowlby’s Attachment Theory — Primary Source Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books. — John Bowlby developed attachment theory at the Tavistock Institute in London beginning in the late 1950s. The three-volume Attachment and Loss series is the foundational text. Bowlby argued that infants are biologically programmed to form attachment bonds with caregivers as a survival mechanism. The quality of early attachment shapes expectations about relationships throughout life.
4. Ainsworth’s Attachment Styles — Strange Situation Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. — Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation experiments identified the specific attachment styles — secure, anxious-ambivalent, and avoidant. This is the research that gave attachment theory its practical clinical framework. The anxious-ambivalent attachment style — hypervigilant to abandonment, seeking closeness urgently, distressed by separations — is this the style most relevant to the pattern?
⚠ VERIFY: The distinction between Bowlby (the theoretical framework) and Ainsworth (the empirical testing and naming of styles) and its importance relative to theory vs. Style. Bowlby built the theory. Ainsworth proved and categorized it. Does knowing both names and their specific contributions serve well in interpreting attachment?
Mechanism 6: Confidence and Status Signaling
5. Dominance and Attraction Research Sadalla, E.K., Kenrick, D.T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730–738. — This study and subsequent research in evolutionary psychology has documented a cross-cultural preference for dominant behavioral cues in short-term mating contexts. The preference is more pronounced in women evaluating men than the reverse. Confidence as an attractiveness cue has been replicated across multiple cultural settings.
⚠ VERIFY: The claim that confidence is attractive across cultures and has evolutionary roots is well supported in the literature. The specific citation above is one of several that support this. Is the general claim on solid ground?
Location & Details
Apply on source →About this listing
This remote opportunity was imported from Freelancer and is shown here for discovery. To apply, follow the link to the original posting.